Need HELP! Let Us Call You Back...
Our Group Action Lawyers are fighting for compensation for vaginal mesh implants claims
Need HELP! Let Us Call You Back...
Thousands of women in the U.K. have been fitted with vaginal mesh implants despite concerns raised by regulators and experts across the world. Vaginal Mesh Implants are used to treat Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), and around 92,000 women in the U.K. alone have been fitted with the synthetic polypropylene mesh devices.
The number of adverse incidents reported is said to be in the thousands, and the problems that can arise if the implant fails are often serious and life-changing, including incontinence and loss of sexual function.
Concerns raised over advice given to patients.
The implants have not been classed as "defective" by the Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and no recall has been initiated in the U.K. The major concern is with the advice given to women about what could happen if things go wrong; what other options are available; and the skill of the surgeon implanting the device.
The MHRA previously ordered a review of the implants in 2012 and came to the conclusion that the benefits of vaginal mesh implants outweighed the risks. However, expert advice says that surgeons need to follow stringent guidelines put in place by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), but this is reportedly not being followed. In fact, there are surgeons carrying out the procedures when their own Trust has banned the use of the implants, and the care standards set in place by NICE are not being followed by all clinicians.
The major worry about the use of the implants is the quality of the advice being given to patients and the lack of specialist surgeons carrying out the procedure. A victim who suffers because of either poor advice or negligent surgery may have a claim for compensation.
If you have suffered problems from having a mesh implant, read the guidelines below. If your vaginal mesh implant has failed, you may have a claim for compensation.
Given the potential for serious complications, the NICE guidelines say clinicians should:
Patients should also be provided with clear written information. The recommendation is to use NICE's own advice.
When it comes to the decisions by clinicians to proceed with the treatment, and the experience and skill of the surgeon required, the guidelines say:
Source: NICE (https://www.nice.org.uk)
Guidance from Sir Bruce Keogh, the NHS Medical Director for England, is as follows:
IF ANY OF THE ABOVE GUIDELINES WERE NOT FOLLOWED FOR YOUR VAGINAL MESH PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR TEAM NOW WHO ARE ALREADY FIGHTING FOR COMPENSATION AS A RESULT OF NEGLIGENT TREATMENT
One of the main issues is the failure of clinicians to properly advise patients and follow the NICE guidelines
Although the safety of the device continues to be questioned, U.K. regulators, the MHRA, said that the benefits of using vaginal mesh implants outweighed the risks, and have reported that there appears to be no safety irregularities between the different implants available on the market. They also noted that the number of adverse incidents are deemed to be low.
However, their research suggests that some women are more susceptible to complications than others, and the skill of the surgeon and the care of the clinicians can affect the success of the procedure. In fact, evidence shows there are clinicians who are failing to follow the key advice put in place by regulatory and advisory bodies, and there are cases where surgeons have gone against the NHS Trust they work for to carry out the procedure even where it is banned.
One surgeon in particular, Mr Arunkalaivanan, continued to use the mesh implant treatment despite the fact that the Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospital NHS Trust whom he worked for had banned them. The discovery of Mr Arunkalaivanan's actions led to a recall of patients under his care because he could not have followed the guidelines in place by NICE given that the Trust was unaware he was carrying out the banned procedure.
We are currently fighting for compensation as a result of the actions of Mr Arunkalaivanan who, in our view, acted irresponsibly.
If the procedure fails, women can be left with irreversible damage...
The procedure is intended to be permanent, meaning that removal of the device can be fraught with serious complications. The anchoring system used to fix the mesh in place can make it difficult, or impossible, to remove.
Studies indicate that 1 in 11 women who have had vaginal mesh implants fitted have experienced problems and complications, including:
In extreme cases, some women have reported crippling pain to the extent that they require high doses of opiates. Some have been declared disabled as their mobility is directly affected as a result of the mesh protruding through the womb.
In one extreme case, a woman suffering from "crippling pain" underwent a hysterectomy, but it later transpired that the pain was being caused by her vaginal mesh implant. Not only has she had her womb removed, but she has been left with permanent pain and is unable to fully care for herself.
NICE is encouraging additional research in to the use of the mesh implants and for the long term outcomes to be closely monitored.
Our Group Action Lawyers are investigating both the safety of the device as well as negligent care and advice to patients
We are fighting for compensation on behalf of victims affected in the U.K. as we believe that the safety of the devices, together with what we believe are cases of gross negligence where clinicians have failed to follow the regulatory guidelines, has led to a number of women suffering horrendous complications from the procedure failing.
Our Group Action Lawyers fight some of the biggest organisations in the world to help thousands of people claim compensation. Our particular expertise in group action cases, medical negligence, and product safety claims is essential for any victim to have the best possible chance of not only recovering the compensation they deserve, but also to ensure that any compensation payable is just and fair.
The majority of the clients we act for are involved in group actions and we're fighting in some of the biggest group actions in the U.K. The law for medical claims and product safety is often complex. Having fought for victims in some of the most well-known U.K. medical product claims, like the PIP breast Implant Scandal and the Metal-On-Metal Hip Implants cases, your claim is safe with us.
Complex areas of law require specialist Group Action Lawyers - and that's what we are
Our mission is simple - to use the combination of our experience and specialism in the areas of group action, medical claims, and product law to fight for justice for anyone who has suffered as a result of the use of vaginal mesh implants.
In the U.S., a payout of around $2 billion has been agreed, and we are fighting for the same justice here in the U.K.
This is a particularly harrowing case where many women have suffered life-altering complications. Although we cannot turn back the clock, we can help you recover financial compensation.
The largest payout in the U.S. was $5.5 million, and we want to ensure similar justice here in the U.K. for anyone who has suffered.
We know the idea of legal claims can be concerning for a lot of people, and even more so when it's something that is very sensitive in nature.
You can rest assured that you are in safe hands with our Group Action Lawyers. We helped a large proportion of the victims of the PIP Breast Implant Scandal which was also sensitive in nature, and we continue to fight for a number of women affected in both the U.K. and in French legal proceedings. We have also represented victims in some of the most confidential and sensitive medical actions that have ever arisen in the U.K.
Not only do we offer supportive legal services, but we can also agree to work on a No Win, No Fee basis, meaning you don't have to worry about paying our costs if the case is lost. We know this is important. Most people simply cannot afford to fund their own legal claims, which is why we offer No Win, No Fee representation.
For confidential advice, you can contact our Group Action Lawyers today on 0800 634 75 75.
Or let us call you back at a time that suits you by filling out our callback form below...
Fill out our quick call back form below and we’ll contact you when you’re ready to talk to us.
All fields marked * are required.
In 2017, former breast surgeon Ian Paterson was reportedly jailed for 20 years after being found guilty of 17 counts of wound...Sep 21, 2021
In March 2020, news of the Virgin Media data leak revealed that as many as 900,000 UK people (mainly customers) had had their...Sep 14, 2021
In July, it was reported that a popular UK site designed for the sale and purchase of guns has been targeted by hackers. As a...Sep 07, 2021
Resulting from a seismic cyberattack, the Equifax data breach was one the largest seen in recent memory. Hitting around 145 m...Aug 31, 2021
In July, it was three years since the NHS Digital data breach was first reported. This was a wide-reaching data protection in...Aug 24, 2021
Due to the nature of data breaches, it is often the case that many people are affected by the same incident. One system insec...Aug 17, 2021
The Spire Healthcare court case has now come to a conclusion after the group was reportedly told �to pay a total of £20,104.3...Aug 10, 2021