Request a call back from our team

Fill out our quick call back form below and we'll contact you when you're ready to talk to us.
All fields marked with an * are required.

Aquilon nebulisers – CE mark withdrawn and supply ceased, but many have remained on the market

medical safety

Despite withdrawal of the CE safety marking for Aquilon series of nebulisers, manufactured by AFP Medical, the nebulisers have still been placed on the market. A number of devices may have been sold despite the withdrawal of the CE marking, which means the safety of the product cannot be guaranteed.

CE safety certification is vital for consumer and supplier confidence in a product, and when it comes to medical products, such approval – or withdrawal, as is the case here – can be even more important.

Despite the withdrawal of the CE mark, the nebulisers and packaging still have the CE mark on them, but it has not been obtained through appropriate regulatory means. The devices are being withdrawn via several NHS Trusts throughout the UK, with any staff involved in the use and maintenance of the devices to take action.

Reported affected Aquilon nebuliser devices include:
  • Aquilon2
  • Aquilon
  • Aquilon+
  • Aquilon Pro series, manufactured since 01 April 2015

The importance of appropriate CE marking

CE safety certification is important, especially in the medical device industry. It’s important that products are properly regulated, and we have seen in the past what happens when medical products are not properly regulated.

The PIP Breast Implant scandal is a classic example. They were given the CE safety certification under false pretences because the PIP company deceived the safety regulator, TÜV Rheinland. We’re acting for many women pursuing claims against TÜV whose cases in the UK either failed due to clinics going bust, or were unable to settle claims in time.

In this scandal, thousands of women worldwide were told to have further surgery for their implants to be exchanged. Many women suffered huge complications because of the need for additional surgery and because of implants rupturing.

The content of this post/page was considered accurate at the time of the original posting and/or at the time of any posted revision. The content of this page may, therefore, be out of date. The information contained within this page does not constitute legal advice. Any reliance you place on the information contained within this page is done so at your own risk.
Related Post

This website uses cookies.